On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 13 Jan 2009, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 7:13 PM, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Mon, 12 Jan 2009, Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: >>>> On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 8:15 PM, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > [...] >> Notice that nested links are actually valid *XML*. Indeed, I asked on >> www-style and they suggested leaving the problem as-is, serving as >> html+xml which is what we do. > > But nested links are neither valid HTML nor valid XHTML. This > restriction (no nested links) is IMVHO quite sensible Sensible? I think it's idiotic, especially since CSS does not and cannot provide enough expression power to obtain the same layout and functionality as what can be achieved by nesting links, so that to achieve these results one has to resort to horirble trickes, effectively destroying the whole purporse of HTML+CSS which is to separate layout from semantics. But anyway. >> The float thing was the second suggestion I was given on www-style. > > What was the first suggestion? And what is www-style? The first suggestion was to just leave things as they are. www-style is www-style@xxxxxxx, the CSS mailing list of the W3C >> Can you provide a patch I can apply to my tree for testing to see how >> it comes up? > > Here it is. Note that CSS could be I think reduced. The size of > gitweb.perl changes is affected by changing calling convention for > git_print_header_html subroutine. It's funny, I was working on a very similar patch myself a couple of days ago, but couldn't get the horizontal filler after the link to work properly, which is why I asked on www-style. I'll test your patch and let you know. > There is also strange artifact at least in Mozilla 1.17.2: if I hover > over ref marker, the subject (title) gets darker background. Curious... Might be some kind of bug with the capturing vs bubbling phase. -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
