On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 12:09:05 -0800 Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > IOW, I consider "whatchanged" a command that is kept only for old timers' > sake. There is no reason to promote it, but there is no reason to > deprecate it, either. Which means the answer to this question... > > > Would it not make more sense to have git whatchanged show the changes > > introduced by merges by default and then people can use the (already > > supported) --no-merges option to suppress that behaviour? > > ... is a NO spelled in capital letters. OK (spelled in capital letters), I won't submit the patch. Cheers, Mark -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
