Re: epic fsck SIGSEGV!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> It has gotten no real testing. Caveat emptor. And I didn't even bother to 
> check that it can run with less stack or that it makes any other 
> difference.

A quick "git fsck --full" in a copy of git.git (eh, "not-so-quick" on a
not-so-quick machine, obviously) shows that the patch does reduce minor
faults significantly.

(without patch)
83.03user 0.60system 1:23.62elapsed 100%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+158275minor)pagefaults 0swaps

(with object_array patch)
82.88user 0.40system 1:23.28elapsed 100%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+95397minor)pagefaults 0swaps

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux