On Wednesday 2008 December 10 21:28:15 Linus Torvalds wrote: >On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, Nicolas Pitre wrote: >> http://marc.info/?l=git&m=122889563424786&w=2 > >Not very pretty. The basic notion is ok, but wouldn't it be nicer to at >least use a "struct object_array" instead? As Junio pointed out, we may want to make similar changes with other calls in fsck_walk with the function itself as a callback. It might even make sense to have a fsck_walk_full that handles managing the object_array itself. While we are making changes, there appears to be a copy and paste error from line 74 to line 76 -- the second "broken link from" should probably be " to". I'd have already submitted a patch for that, but I can't figure out how to tell kmail to not do quoted-printable. :( [And, if I can beat this client into submission I will.] Linus, sorry about the reply with no snipping or original content. I mis-clicked. :( -- Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. ,= ,-_-. =. bss03@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx ((_/)o o(\_)) ICQ: 514984 YM/AIM: DaTwinkDaddy `-'(. .)`-' http://iguanasuicide.org/ \_/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
