"Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy" <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 12/2/08, Scott Chacon <schacon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> diff --git a/git.c b/git.c
>> index 89feb0b..9e5813c 100644
>> --- a/git.c
>> +++ b/git.c
>> @@ -266,6 +266,7 @@ static void handle_internal_command(int argc, const char **argv)
>> const char *cmd = argv[0];
>> static struct cmd_struct commands[] = {
>> { "add", cmd_add, RUN_SETUP | NEED_WORK_TREE },
>> + { "stage", cmd_add, RUN_SETUP | NEED_WORK_TREE },
>> { "annotate", cmd_annotate, RUN_SETUP },
>> { "apply", cmd_apply },
>> { "archive", cmd_archive },
>
> Nit-picking. There are some references to "git add" in builtin-add.c,
> like help usage or error message ("Maybe you wanted to say 'git add
> .'?\n"). Should it refer to "git stage" instead as well?
I do not think that is necessary. As git-stage(1) makes it clear, it is
an alias to "add", not the other way around.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
