On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Jakub Narebski <jnareb@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> The problems with nesting is those pesky remotes with only single >>> tracked branch to them; they are I think quote common... well, unless >>> you do one-shot pull, directly into local branch. >> >> My idea with this would be to only create a group if it has at least >> N > 1 (probably N=2) entries. > > A bit of complication is that you would have then series of > 'uncategorized' (not in any subsection) entries / remote-tracking > branches. We'll put them in their own group 8-) >> Yes, I will resend the 'remote_heads' feature as a new (reduced) >> patchset, then add (separate patchset) grouping for ref lists, and >> then add (yet another patchset) detached head. > > That is I think a good idea. > > P.S. I think that sending this patch series for review, even if it was > not perfect was a very good idea... well, perhaps some patches could > be marked as RFC. That's what they were when I first sent them last year 8-) > It is hard work to prepare good patches, then wait for review, then > wait a bit that there is no further review, working on the patches, > resend and wait for review, or for Ack and merge-in... Keep up good > work. Thanks. -- Giuseppe "Oblomov" Bilotta -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
