Re: [PATCH] Teach/Fix pull/fetch -q/-v options

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 6:42 PM, Tuncer Ayaz <tuncer.ayaz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 2:15 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> @@ -637,9 +638,9 @@ int cmd_fetch(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
>>>               remote = remote_get(argv[0]);
>>>
>>>       transport = transport_get(remote, remote->url[0]);
>>> -     if (verbose >= 2)
>>> +     if (verbosity == VERBOSE)
>>>               transport->verbose = 1;
>>> -     if (quiet)
>>> +     if (verbosity == QUIET)
>>>               transport->verbose = -1;
>>>       if (upload_pack)
>>>               set_option(TRANS_OPT_UPLOADPACK, upload_pack);
>>
>> In the original code, the variable verbose can be ">= 2" when "-v -v" is
>> given, so transport->verbose is not turned on with a single "-v" alone
>> (this correctly mimics the original behaviour in the scripted version).
>>
>
> Doesn't this also mean that we need to be able to concatenate
> multiple -v options in git-pull.sh similar to what one of the first
> versions of my patch did?
>
> <snip>
>

The next patch revision arriving here in a minute or two
will do the following in git-pull.sh:
1) if -q then verbosity=-q
2) if -v then verbosity=verbosity + -v

This means that git pull -v -q will reset verbosity to -q
and allow counting of -v instances. If this is not desired
or incorrect another change is needed :-).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux