On Fri, 2008-11-14 at 21:44 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Actually, POSIX does not even talk about EPERM for mkdir(2), but that was > not my point. The code does something different from what the proposed > commit log message talks about. That was what bothered me. My wording was a little terse and confusing. Here's a new one; Subject: sha1_file.c: resolve confusion EACCESS vs EPERM EPERM or 'Operation not permitted' is an unlikely error from mkstemp(); test for EACCESS 'Access Denied' instead. Make the special branch which prints the error to the user nicely also understand EACCESS. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
