Sam Vilain <sam@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Subject: sha1_file: accept EACCESS as equivalent to EPERM
>
> This was testing for 'Operation not permitted' rather than any kind
> of 'Permission Denied' error; prefer EACCESS.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sam Vilain <sam@xxxxxxxxxx>
> --
> Sorry for the inevitable wrapping/whitespace fail :(
>
> diff --git a/sha1_file.c b/sha1_file.c
> index 7662330..cd422e6 100644
> --- a/sha1_file.c
> +++ b/sha1_file.c
> @@ -2231,7 +2231,7 @@ static int create_tmpfile(char *buffer, size_t
> bufsiz, const char *filename)
> memcpy(buffer, filename, dirlen);
> strcpy(buffer + dirlen, "tmp_obj_XXXXXX");
> fd = mkstemp(buffer);
> - if (fd < 0 && dirlen && (errno != EPERM)) {
> + if (fd < 0 && dirlen && (errno != EACCESS)) {
Is this accepting the two as equivalents???
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
