Re: Stgit and refresh-temp

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2008-11-12 10:02:10 +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:

> I think it's just a matter of updating HEAD on the "merge_conflict"
> path but I'm still not fully confident in modifying the new lib
> infrastructure.

You're probably right.

I'll do it, but you're welcome to beat me to it if you like; I promise
to read your patch extra carefully if you do.

(I'll drop you a mail when I start attacking this, to prevent any
duplicated work.)

> 2008/11/12 Karl Hasselström <kha@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> > I'll build a test case for that as well.
>
> We test the conflicts quite a lot in the "push" tests but this
> command hasn't been converted to the new infrastructure yet.

Yes. As soon as we convert push and/or pop, this will be caught by the
test suite. But that just means the test suite needs extending ...

-- 
Karl Hasselström, kha@xxxxxxxxxxx
      www.treskal.com/kalle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux