Re: Stgit and refresh-temp

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2008/11/7 Karl Hasselström <kha@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On 2008-11-04 08:37:24 -0500, Jon Smirl wrote:
>
>> I hit a case when refreshing a buried patch that needed a merge
>> conflict sorted out. I'm unable to recover out of the state.
>
> Hmm, so what you're saying is basically that you did something with
> "stg refresh -p" that caused a merge conflict, and that messed things
> up so that you needed to run "stg repair". Is that right?
>
> Have you been able to reproduce it? (I would like to add the failing
> case to the test suite.)

Could be related to this - if I run 'stg goto some-patch' and it fails
with a conflict, the HEAD points to the previous patch though the
stack has the conflicting patch as empty (which is normal) and the
conflicts in the index. Anything after that says HEAD and top not
equal and 'stg repair' is needed.

-- 
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux