Re: Git/Mercurial interoperability (and what about bzr?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Nov 01, 2008 at 10:51:51AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> 
> On Sat, 1 Nov 2008, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > 
> > .hgtags is stored as a versioned file in Mercurial.  That's one of the
> > problems, and it leads to no shortage of headaches.
> 
> I told people this was insane long long ago, and I thought the hg people 
> had learnt to use local tags. They act sanely, as far as I know (ie they 
> act the same way git tags do).
> 
> Of course, the problem with hg local tags is that hg apparently has no 
> sane way to _propagate_ such local tag-space information from one 
> repository to another. But that's purely a problem with hg itself. I don't 
> know why that hasn't gotten fixed.

Yeah, well, hg calls them _local_ tags, and so people consider that by
design, they aren't supposed to be propagated outside of the local
repository.  As I recall, hg doesn't support GPG signing local tags,
for the same reason.

							- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux