Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > But it makes me a little nervous. On one hand, I think it is definitely > the right thing for "status -v" to respect user options. But we do > several _other_ diffs in addition, and those are more "plumbing" diffs. > I think they should probably at least have diff_basic_config (e.g., for > rename limits). But we are applying the diff_ui_config options to all > diffs. Looking over the available options, I _think_ there are no nasty > surprises. But you never know. Up to 6/8 are indisputably good changes. The next one means well, and this one is a requisite step for it, but I agree that this feels somewhat risky. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
