"Giuseppe Bilotta" <giuseppe.bilotta@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 1:23 AM, Jean-Luc Herren <jlh@xxxxxx> wrote: > > If you decide against a shared repository, maybe you want to > > consider to not use ".zit.file/", but ".zit/file/" as the > > repository? This would reduce the clutter to a single directory, > > just like with ".git". And moving files around wouldn't be that > > much complicated. > > Right. I'll give that a shot. By the way RCS which I use for version control of single files use both approaches: it can store 'file,v' alongside 'file' (just like your '.zit.file/' or '.file.git/'), but it can also store files on per-directory basis in 'RCS/' subdirectory (proposed '.zit/file/' or '.zit/file.git/' solution) By the way, it would be nice to have VC interface for Emacs for Zit... -- Jakub Narebski Poland ShadeHawk on #git -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
