Hi! Giuseppe Bilotta wrote: > So today I decided to start hacking at a git-based but file-oriented > content tracker, which I decided to name Zit. This sounds great and would seem very useful to manage my ~/bin/ directory which contains a set of unrelated one-file-tools that evolve over time. I haven't played with it yet though. > when you choose to start tracking a file with Zit [...] > Zit will create a directory .zit.file to hold a git repository If you have many files you want to track in a single directory (like ~/bin/), all those additional directories will quickly feel like clutter. If you track every file, it will even double the number of things you see with an "ls -a". If you decide against a shared repository, maybe you want to consider to not use ".zit.file/", but ".zit/file/" as the repository? This would reduce the clutter to a single directory, just like with ".git". And moving files around wouldn't be that much complicated. jlh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
