Re: On Sponsor Notices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 11:43:52AM +1200, Martin Langhoff wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Petr Baudis <pasky@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >  However, I'm not sure if acknowledging the Novartis-originated patches
> > in the log message like this is the best practice and we will understand
> > if the maintainers will decide to strip these notices when applying the
> > patches.
> 
> AIUI, the signed-off-by line is meant to track this, and it serves
> both legal purposes and a as recognition.

That works fine when it is signed off by employers using their company
e-mail, but that is not feasible in my case - what should be in the
Signed-off-line? Name of the company? What about the e-mail? Some
generic e-mail of the legal department? That doesn't really work well
with all the machinery developed around s-o-b lines, besides the
question does not seem to be by far that simple with such a huge
corporation.

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
People who take cold baths never have rheumatism, but they have
cold baths.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux