Re: On Sponsor Notices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 10:51 AM, Petr Baudis <pasky@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>  to follow up a little on the "This patch has been sponsored by
> Novartis" messages - I have been on a summer internship at Novartis busy
> deploying Git and these patches (still quite a few more to come, mostly
> for gitweb) have been one of the main outputs of that work.

In my case, if the contribution is done at the behest of a client the
copyright is theirs (they paid for my work, and it's a "work for hire"
in legal terms). So

 - if the contribution is large, I tend to add a copyright line (see
git-cvsserver: copyright != authors, though that's out of date now)

 - they probably have to provide sign-off, so s-o-b line is appropriate

>  However, I'm not sure if acknowledging the Novartis-originated patches
> in the log message like this is the best practice and we will understand
> if the maintainers will decide to strip these notices when applying the
> patches.

AIUI, the signed-off-by line is meant to track this, and it serves
both legal purposes and a as recognition.

cheers,



m
-- 
 martin.langhoff@xxxxxxxxx
 martin@xxxxxxxxxx -- School Server Architect
 - ask interesting questions
 - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first
 - http://wiki.laptop.org/go/User:Martinlanghoff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux