On Tuesday 23 September 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Johan Herland <johan@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> > After looking over this once more, I think the HTML regexp should be
> > changed as follows. This fixes a buglet that was part of my original
> > HTML pattern, and although this patch textually depends on Brandon's
> > work, it is conceptually independent of his refactorization.
> > ...
> > - { "html", "^[ \t]*(<[Hh][1-6][ \t].*>.*)$", REG_EXTENDED },
> > + { "html", "^[ \t]*(<[Hh][1-6]([ \t].*)?>.*)$", REG_EXTENDED },
>
> I do not think these two particularly would make much difference. Why
> isn't it simply...
>
> "<[Hh][1-6].*"
>
> without even any capture or anchor?
>
> It would falsely hit oddball cases like <h1foo> which is not <h1>, but
> anybody who uses such a nonstandard thing deserves it, imnvho ;-).
Ok. I agree. Go ahead.
...Johan
--
Johan Herland, <johan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
www.herland.net
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
