Johan Herland <johan@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> After looking over this once more, I think the HTML regexp should be
> changed as follows. This fixes a buglet that was part of my original
> HTML pattern, and although this patch textually depends on Brandon's
> work, it is conceptually independent of his refactorization.
> ...
> - { "html", "^[ \t]*(<[Hh][1-6][ \t].*>.*)$", REG_EXTENDED },
> + { "html", "^[ \t]*(<[Hh][1-6]([ \t].*)?>.*)$", REG_EXTENDED },
I do not think these two particularly would make much difference. Why
isn't it simply...
"<[Hh][1-6].*"
without even any capture or anchor?
It would falsely hit oddball cases like <h1foo> which is not <h1>, but
anybody who uses such a nonstandard thing deserves it, imnvho ;-).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
