Re: [PATCH 2/4] diff.c: associate a flag with each pattern and use it for compiling regex

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Andreas Ericsson <ae@xxxxxx> writes:

> Junio C Hamano wrote:
> ...
>>>  static struct funcname_pattern {
>>>  	char *name;
>>>  	char *pattern;
>>> +	int cflags;
>>
>> What does "C" stand for?
>
> "compile". It's the same name as regcomp(3) uses for the flags being
> used to compile the regular expression. The full mnemonic name would
> be regex_compile_flag, which is a bit unwieldy. Perhaps regcomp_flags
> would be a good compromise?

Ah, I see.

When I saw that new field for the first time, I didn't think it will be
used to store the bare flag values regcomp/regexec library would accept
directly (I expected we would see #define or enum to tweak our own set of
features, not limiting ourselves EXTENDED/ICASE etc. that regcomp/regexec
library supports)

IOW, it just did not click for me to look at "man 3 regcomp" which says:

    int regcomp(regex_t *preg, const char *regex, int cflags);

So unless others feel that we might get a better layering separation by
not storing REG_EXTENDED and stuff directly in that field (which was my
initial reaction without looking at 4/4 which does store REG_EXTENDED
there without our own enums), cflag is perfectly a good name here.

Thanks --- I am bit under the weather and not thinking quite straight.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux