Re: RFC: perhaps a "new file" should not be deleted by "git reset --hard"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mike Hommey <mh <at> glandium.org> writes:

> Note that reflog only contains references to commit sha1s, so it can't
> track index status.

Yes I realize that.

My point was that the file is entirely gone (except via "git fsck").
I wouldn't expect the reflog to reference it, but I was just mentioning
it for completeness (since it's often help in recovering from types of
lossage).



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux