Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>On Thu, 11 Sep 2008, Stephen R. van den Berg wrote:
>> Well, the principle of least surprise dictates that they should be kept
>> by gc as described above, however...
>> I can envision an option to gc say "--drop-weak-links" which does
>> exactly what you describe.
>Don't you think this starts to look silly at that point?
No, it's the developers vote controlling his own repository saying:
Ok, I expressed interest in the other branches and their
backport/forwardport relationships, but I changed my mind. Drop all
backport/forwardport information on branches I don't explicitly have.
--
Sincerely,
Stephen R. van den Berg.
"There are three types of people in the world;
those who can count, and those who can't."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
