Re: pack count on repo.or.cz [was "Medium term dreams"]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 03:49:32PM +0200, Johannes Sixt wrote:
> Petr Baudis schrieb:
> >> As to why the other packs weren't pruned, I don't know. In my example,
> >> you can see that the pruning happens as we expect. So either there is a
> >> bug in git-prune-packed, or there is something we're not realizing.
> > 
> > Well, that's my question here. :-)
> 
> Does removing all the *.keep files help? ;)

Haha, good catch - thanks! :-) I wonder where they came from, though I
hazily remember some curious behaviour of older Git versions wrt. .keep
files and they seem all to be of old date. Now I have a single nice pack
and fsck of all the forks still passes fine.

Thanks all, I will adopt this for all projects.

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
The next generation of interesting software will be done
on the Macintosh, not the IBM PC.  -- Bill Gates
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux