On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 07:54:24AM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > So did you check for loose objects? That is what you should get if there > were any objects that would have been lost. If there aren't any new > loose objects, then there were no objects that would be lost. Before: rover:/srv/git/git.git# l objects~/??/* | wc -l 3343 rover:/srv/git/git.git# l objects~/pack/* | wc -l 750 After: rover:/srv/git/git.git# l objects/??/* | wc -l 2920 rover:/srv/git/git.git# l objects/pack/* | wc -l 590 > As to why the other packs weren't pruned, I don't know. In my example, > you can see that the pruning happens as we expect. So either there is a > bug in git-prune-packed, or there is something we're not realizing. Well, that's my question here. :-) If you're still interested in looking into this further, you can wget -r or rsync over the git.git repository from repo.or.cz. -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis The next generation of interesting software will be done on the Macintosh, not the IBM PC. -- Bill Gates -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
