On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 11:06:06AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > I didn't try either but I think you are right. And I agree we should say > we rely on 5.6 or newer. If we don't change it we need to rely on 5.8 or newer as my initial patch suggested. If there are problems with that change I recommend just using my initial patch changing the documentation to require Perl 5.8 since my interest in Perl 5.6 support is not big enough to mess around with quoting all that stuff. If someone really needs this he or she can still do it --- it should be not too difficult. Robert -- Robert Schiele Dipl.-Wirtsch.informatiker mailto:rschiele@xxxxxxxxx "Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur."
Attachment:
pgpdWANQLN7ho.pgp
Description: PGP signature
