Re: [kernel.org users] [RFD] On deprecating "git-foo" for builtins

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 06:25:13PM +0200, Petr Baudis wrote:

> > git-<tab><tab> ... what? 140-something commands? I'll better start looking
> > for alternatives _right now_!
> 
> Actually, this is the only realistic argument I can remember at all.
> Are there any others? I couldn't come up with any - but I didn't do much
> history digging: others seem to be equally in dark, though.

The three reasons I can recall are:

  - too many commands on completion

  - confusion between "git-*" and "git *" equivalence, and inability to
    perform some operations with "git-*" (like git --no-pager).

  - I might be wrong, but I think there was discussion of a
    hardlink-challenged platform where we wasted space by copying the
    'git' binary. Taking git-* out of /usr/bin is the first step to
    removing the hardlinks entirely.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux