Re: Call Me Gitless

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 02:39:22PM -0400, Daniel Barkalow wrote:

> Hmm... everybody who doesn't like it is concerned about scripts and 
> sending it places, while the people who like it seem to be interested in 
> looking at the output. Maybe there should be an option that controls it, 
> with the default being to use -a+b for pipelines and informational stuff 
> for pager?

To clarify my statement: no, I'm concerned about looking at it. That is,
I don't think it will break scripts, but I think the output is
potentially confusing to humans.

But like I said before, it's just my intuition; I don't have real facts
to back it up, so feel free to ignore.

> (For that matter, maybe format-patch should be able to handle uncommitted 
> changes, and should hide what it did? What's with all these people faking 
> format-patch output with other commands, rather than having format-patch 
> actually generate suitable output in their situations?)

I do it because I haven't actually committed the content.  I dump the
diff right into an email I'm already writing.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux