Re: [StGit PATCH] Add some tests of refreshing removed files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2008-08-04 10:07:45 -0400, Jon Smirl wrote:

> I just updated to current git and stg and retested. Tracking a
> remove is working now for me.

Well, that's good.

> Tools were about three months old before updating.

Might have been fixed by 8fe07fa4cef (Handle refresh of changed files
with non-ASCII names) or 466bfe50 (Fix "refresh" failure with moved
files (bug 11661)).

> Not sure what changed. But I definitely couldn't get stgit to do it
> and had to use git commands to generate the patch. I would remove
> the file, refresh and the patch was empty. stg status would show the
> file in D state. As soon as I touched something else and refreshed
> the rm would appear in the patch.

Well, that's exactly what my new test tests for. So at least i got it
right.

> Maybe there is more to the triggering sequence than a simple rm.
> I'll keep a watch out and see if I can figure out how I got into the
> state.

Thanks.

-- 
Karl Hasselström, kha@xxxxxxxxxxx
      www.treskal.com/kalle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux