On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 12:49:00AM +0200, Sverre Rabbelier wrote:
> Why does handle_internal_command not complain after the " for (i = 0;
> i < ARRAY_SIZE(commands); i++) {" that no matching commands were
> found? Is that not an implicit assertion that would do well with being
> asserted here?
Because it is called from two places. In one, we _know_ that this must
be internal, so we die right after. In the other, we try internal, then
external, then alias. So we don't want to die. Grep for
handle_internal_cmmand in git.c.
-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
