Re: [RFC] custom strategies in builtin-merge

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > ... especially since I hope that we have them builtin soon, and not 
> > only that, but have builtin-merge call them as C functions, not with 
> > fork() and exec().
> 
> Because builtin-merge.c does not directly use fork/exec but uses 
> run_command() interface, non POSIX platforms can spawn subprocesses just 
> fine, can't they?

Yes, they can.  Slowly, but they do.

But why should they?  Efficient merging is such a prominent feature of 
Git; I do not agree to let it remain a second-class feature.

Ciao,
Dscho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux