Re: [RFC] custom strategies in builtin-merge

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 13:33, Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 1) Maintain a list of commands that has a git-merge- prefix, but not a
> strategy. This list would currently contain "base, file, index,
> one-file and tree".

Sounds a bit error prone, and could lead to unexpected results if/when
someone creates a new command ('git merge status' anyone?) which is
then suddenly treated as a merge strategy.

> 2) Require custom strategies to have a different naming scheme, like
> if "foo" is a custom strategy, then it would have to be named
> git-merge-custom-foo, _not_ git-merge-foo.

I think this is cleaner, what would be even nicer is to change the
current names too, so name them all "git-merge-stragegy-foo".

-- 
Cheers,

Sverre Rabbelier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux