Re: [RFC PATCH 00/12] Sparse checkout

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 7/24/08, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote:
>  > > No, I did mean the index.  This is an attribute of the index: either
>  > > it is sparsely checked out or not.  You can even have multiple indices
>  > > (switching between them by setting GIT_INDEX_FILE) which have
>  > > different prefixes.
>  >
>  > I don't think so. It's a mask for workdir, right? If you save it it
>  > index, you can switch index and the prefix as well, but workdir only has
>  > several subtrees that do not fit any other prefix than the original
>  > prefix.
>
>
> Ah, you adroitly avoided addressing the issue that the user can change the
>  prefix without the index ever noticing.

Forgive my ignorance. I still do not get why index must notice prefix
change? The only reason I can think of is that we must make sure there
won't be any user-modification in index outside the prefix. But that
can be guarded from higher level (plumbings and porcelains) because
index is allowed to have modification outside sparse prefix
(auto-merged entries).
-- 
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux