Re: [RFC PATCH 00/12] Sparse checkout

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:

> On 7/23/08, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >  On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy wrote:
> >
> >  > So in short, sparse prefix will be stored in config, 
> >  > core.sparsecheckout.
> >
> > Do you really think the prefix should be stored anywhere else than the 
> > index?
> >
> > With core.sparseCheckout you have to introduce a _sh*tload_ of config 
> > loaders.
> >
> > And with core.sparseCheckout you are at the whim of the user, since 
> > .git/config is _supposed_ to be user-editable.
> >
> > From a logical point of view, I'd say that the sparse prefix has 
> > nothing to do with the "configuration" of the local repository.
> 
> Well, whatever place. I chose .git/config because I did not want to 
> introduce a new config place. But then how about .git/sparsecheckout?

No, I did mean the index.  This is an attribute of the index: either it is 
sparsely checked out or not.  You can even have multiple indices 
(switching between them by setting GIT_INDEX_FILE) which have different 
prefixes.

Ciao,
Dscho "who seems to recall that the first series was much less intrusive"

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux