Re: q: faster way to integrate/merge lots of topic branches?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Ahh, missed that somebody already suggested it.

On Wed, 23 Jul 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> hm, it's very slow:
> 
>   $ time git branch --no-merged
>   [...]
> 
>   real    0m9.177s
>   user    0m9.027s
>   sys     0m0.129s
> 
> when running it on tip/master:
> 
>   http://people.redhat.com/mingo/tip.git/README

We can probably speed it up, but more importantly, even if we don't, it's 
slow _once_.

It's worth taking a 9s hit, if that means that you can then skip half of 
the merges entirely, and thus win half of the 53s cost. 

But I'll look if there's a way to cut it down from 9s. I suspect it has to 
traverse the whole history to make 100% sure that something isn't merged, 
but even that should be faster than 9s.

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux