Re: q: faster way to integrate/merge lots of topic branches?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



* SZEDER Gábor <szeder@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 03:05:18PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > I've got the following, possibly stupid question: is there a way to 
> > merge a healthy number of topic branches into the master branch in a 
> > quicker way, when most of the branches are already merged up?
> > 
> > Right now i've got something like this scripted up:
> > 
> >   for B in $(git-branch | cut -c3- ); do git-merge $B; done 
> you cound use 'git branch --no-merged' to list only those branches
> that have not been merged into your current HEAD.

hm, it's very slow:

  $ time git branch --no-merged
  [...]

  real    0m9.177s
  user    0m9.027s
  sys     0m0.129s

when running it on tip/master:

  http://people.redhat.com/mingo/tip.git/README

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux