The git-merge documentation's "HOW MERGE WORKS" section is confusingly composed and actually omits the most interesting part, the merging of the arguments into HEAD itself, surprisingly not actually mentioning the fast-forward merge anywhere. This patch replaces the "[NOTE]" screenful of highly technical details by a single sentence summing up the interesting information, and instead explains how are the arguments compared with HEAD and the three possible inclusion states that are named "Already up-to-date", "Fast-forward" and "True merge". It also makes it clear that the rest of the section talks only about the true merge situation. Junio initiated the removal of the Note screenful altogether and offered many stylistical fixes. Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@xxxxxxx> --- Documentation/git-merge.txt | 69 ++++++++++++++++--------------------------- 1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/git-merge.txt b/Documentation/git-merge.txt index 019e4ca..77c62aa 100644 --- a/Documentation/git-merge.txt +++ b/Documentation/git-merge.txt @@ -57,50 +57,31 @@ HOW MERGE WORKS A merge is always between the current `HEAD` and one or more commits (usually, branch head or tag), and the index file must -exactly match the -tree of `HEAD` commit (i.e. the contents of the last commit) when -it happens. In other words, `git diff --cached HEAD` must -report no changes. - -[NOTE] -This is a bit of a lie. In certain special cases, your index is -allowed to be different from the tree of the `HEAD` commit. The most -notable case is when your `HEAD` commit is already ahead of what -is being merged, in which case your index can have arbitrary -differences from your `HEAD` commit. Also, your index entries -may have differences from your `HEAD` commit that match -the result of a trivial merge (e.g. you received the same patch -from an external source to produce the same result as what you are -merging). For example, if a path did not exist in the common -ancestor and your head commit but exists in the tree you are -merging into your repository, and if you already happen to have -that path exactly in your index, the merge does not have to -fail. - -Otherwise, merge will refuse to do any harm to your repository -(that is, it may fetch the objects from remote, and it may even -update the local branch used to keep track of the remote branch -with `git pull remote rbranch:lbranch`, but your working tree, -`.git/HEAD` pointer and index file are left intact). In addition, -merge always sets `.git/ORIG_HEAD` to the original state of HEAD so -a problematic merge can be removed by using `git reset ORIG_HEAD`. - -You may have local modifications in the working tree files. In -other words, 'git-diff' is allowed to report changes. -However, the merge uses your working tree as the working area, -and in order to prevent the merge operation from losing such -changes, it makes sure that they do not interfere with the -merge. Those complex tables in read-tree documentation define -what it means for a path to "interfere with the merge". And if -your local modifications interfere with the merge, again, it -stops before touching anything. - -So in the above two "failed merge" case, you do not have to -worry about loss of data --- you simply were not ready to do -a merge, so no merge happened at all. You may want to finish -whatever you were in the middle of doing, and retry the same -pull after you are done and ready. - +match the tree of `HEAD` commit (i.e. the contents of the last commit) +when it starts out. In other words, `git diff --cached HEAD` must +report no changes. (One exception is when the changed index +entries are already in the same state that would result from +the merge anyway.) + +Three kinds of merge can happen: + +* The merged commit is already contained in `HEAD`. This is the + simplest case, called "Already up-to-date." + +* `HEAD` is already contained in the merged commit. This is the + most common case especially when involved through 'git pull': + you are tracking an upstream repository, committed no local + changes and now you want to update to a newer upstream revision. + Your `HEAD` (and the index) is updated to at point the merged + commit, without creating an extra merge commit. This is + called "Fast-forward". + +* Both the merged commit and `HEAD` are independent and must be + tied together by a merge commit that has them both as its parents. + The rest of this section describes this "True merge" case. + +The chosen merge strategy merges the two commits into a single +new source tree. When things cleanly merge, these things happen: 1. The results are updated both in the index file and in your -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
