Hi, On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:34:31PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Petr Baudis <pasky@xxxxxxx> writes: > > > I'm not sure if I should resend the updated patch, or if you already > > included your comments yourself. > > When I send my review comments out, I generally expect an updated version, > unless I explicitly say "will apply with tweaks, no need to resend". ok, that is pretty much what I expected, I just wanted to avoid doing duplicate work. :-) ..snip.. > yes, I am strongly hinting to drop that description; it > is not even remotely interesting I have tried to salvage the now-subsection for a while yet, but ultimately, I now feel as well that it is not worth it; the meat of it can be summed up in a single sentence that I have re-added to the main section. > However, I think we may want to talk about "How to tell if your merge did > not even touch your index nor working tree" somewhere in the manual. > "When there are conflicts, these things happen" part talks about how to > resolve conflicts, but when merge refuses to avoid losing local changes, > the instruction in that part does not apply. I'm not sure if this is worth pondering about? The action would feel rather obvious to me - get rid of the local changes somehow, either committing them or stashing them or wiping them out. Is that worth elaborating, or is there more to it? -- Petr "Pasky" Baudis GNU, n. An animal of South Africa, which in its domesticated state resembles a horse, a buffalo and a stag. In its wild condition it is something like a thunderbolt, an earthquake and a cyclone. -- A. Pierce -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html