Re: Should we discuss Windows-related changes on git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Sat, 12 Jul 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> 
> I think that is a perfect example, since Hannes worked on it in mingw.git.  
> AFAIR a few comments came through msysGit, and were incorporated.  When 
> everything was good for a first go at git@vger, it was sent, and the 
> interface finalized.

Umm. Dscho - that was before the thing was merged.

Now that the basic mingw support is part of standard git, the situation 
has changed.

That's the main issue here - if mingw support is in standard git (and it 
is), then mingw issues that touch any non-mingw code should be discussed 
where all the git developers are.

Can't you see the difference between the pre-merge and the post-merge 
situation?

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux