Re: Should we discuss Windows-related changes on git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Steffen Prohaska wrote:

> I decided to stop queuing changes in 4msysgit.  Instead I'd like to
> bring the diff between Junio's and 4msysgit's master to zero.  This
> seems to be achievable after Junio merged Hannes' MinGW changes.
> 
> I think all Windows-related changes to the git code base could be
> discussed directly on the main git list and the msysgit list would be
> reserved for the MinGW/MSYS runtime environment and the installer.

I disagree.  Judging from the mails I read on the git list, Junio gets 
really swamped by patches these days (what with our very productive GSoC 
students).

I really think that we should discuss the patches on the msysGit list 
first, whip them into shape, and then send them off.

Just think of those patches that were sent off, only to realize that they 
were no longer needed.  That should not have happened.

My 2p,
Dscho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux