Re: Should we discuss Windows-related changes on git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Fri, 11 Jul 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > And if the separation is not always that clear, why not discuss those 
> > things on msysGit first, and then come to git@vger with our minds (and 
> > possibly our patches) made up?
> 
> I know you mean well, but my impression from reading the kernel list is 
> that often a message that says "we already debated this issue on our 
> list to death and here is our conclusion, take it or leave it" to the 
> audience is not accepted warmly, and more central kernel people may even 
> say "do not hide the discussion in the subsystem list, do it in the 
> open, discussion on the subsystem list does not matter".

I never meant on insisting that we find the final solution on the msysGit 
list, and I would _never_ suggest that anything sent to git@vger is final.  
It is always subject to discussion.

Anyway, enough said (since I think that you and me are in agreement here),
Dscho

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux