Hi, On Wed, 2 Jul 2008, Jeff King wrote: > On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 01:08:09AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > > So if the problem is "old perl", I don't think it is an issue. Are > > > there modern perl installations in the wild that don't have > > > File::Temp? > > > > The thing is, I think I heard quite similar explanation why Test::More > > is safe to use when the patch to add t/t9700 was submit. Then what > > happened? > > ISTR the Test::More problem was reported by Linus, who is a Fedora user? > I tried searching for any reasonable information on which of the core > perl modules are installed by default on Fedora systems, but didn't come > up with anything useful. > > I really have no clue as to what is out there, and I suspect we must > either play it totally safe, or push the limits and wait for people to > complain about breakage. I wonder why bother trying to import things when you do not need them to begin with! I mean, it is _obvious_ that in this case, we want .git/ to be writable _anyway_, so why not stick with a fixed name in that? Ciao, Dscho -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
