On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 01:08:09AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > So if the problem is "old perl", I don't think it is an issue. Are there > > modern perl installations in the wild that don't have File::Temp? > > The thing is, I think I heard quite similar explanation why Test::More is > safe to use when the patch to add t/t9700 was submit. Then what happened? ISTR the Test::More problem was reported by Linus, who is a Fedora user? I tried searching for any reasonable information on which of the core perl modules are installed by default on Fedora systems, but didn't come up with anything useful. I really have no clue as to what is out there, and I suspect we must either play it totally safe, or push the limits and wait for people to complain about breakage. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
