Hi,
On Sun, 22 Jun 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> > +static int blame_bottomtop_callback(const struct option *option, const char *arg, int unset)
> > +{
> > + const char **bottomtop = option->value;
> > + if (!arg)
> > + return -1;
> > + if (*bottomtop)
> > + die("More than one '-L n,m' option given");
> > + *bottomtop = arg;
> > + return 0;
> > +}
>
> Hmmmm. I actually wanted to eventually allow more than one -L so that we
> can blame two functions inside a file, for example. Would this make it
> even harder, I have to wonder...
IMHO this would not change anything in the way of making it harder; it is
just a matter of adding the pairs to a container. The more tricky thing
is how to handle a bunch of intervals efficiently, without introducing
too much ugliness.
Ciao,
Dscho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
