On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 at 11:32pm +0100, Mircea Bardac wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Is there any straightforward way of doing git blame for all the files that got > changed in a commit. Problems are renames, deletes and copies. Sounds like you want to track files rather than content. Git tracks the latter. > I was also thinking of git diff with a huge number of context lines, but this > one feels a bit hacking. "git diff" is also missing author info, so "git > blame" is a bit more desirable. > > Has anyone ever done this before? > > Many thanks. Try "git diff --name-only commit1..commit2" or "git log --name-only commit1..commit2". This will give you only the names of the files in which content was altered. Other than that, I think you should re-read (hint) git-blame(1). It's focus is on content, not files as a whole. -- Ian Hilt Ian.Hilt (at) gmx.com GnuPG key: 0x4AFC1EE3 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
