On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 02:40:50PM +0200, Wincent Colaiuta wrote: > Sounds a little bit over-engineered to me. > > So, "stash" is intended for short-term storage, but by adding a "keep" > option you're officially blessing it for long-term storage as well. And > the interface that you propose, explicitly marking stuff as "for keeps" > and being able to move stuff from "temp" to "keep" sounds quite > complicated. I agree. I like the expiration of stashes, but if it is a choice between "just don't expire them" and "here is a complex set of rules and obligations for preventing them from expiring" I think we are better off just leaving them. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
