Re: [PATCH 2/2] git-gc: skip stashes when expiring reflogs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Jeff King wrote:

> I agree. If you are concerned about valuable stashes getting deleted, my
> guess is one of:
> 
>   - you would like reflog expiration to be longer
> 
>   - you are using stash as a long-term storage, which it was never
>     intended for. Use a branch.
> 
> The latter, of course, is based on my use and my impression of others
> use (I almost always apply a stash within 30 seconds of having stashed
> it). So maybe everyone is keeping stashes around for months, and this is
> a useful change.

As you say, branches are there just for that: keeping changes for 
months.  Stashes are not meant to be used like that nor should we 
encourage it.


Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux