On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 10:43:59AM +0200, Wincent Colaiuta wrote: > While this may be true for codebases which move forward quickly, what > about one which is basically finished and tends not to get touched in a > long time. A situation arises, you stash something, the phone rings, and > for whatever reason the stash gets forgotten and you don't revisit the > project at all for days, weeks, months. It wouldn't be nice to eventually > come back and discover that your in-progress work had been "garbage" > collected for you. I think this argues more for increasing the expiration period on reflogs, if your project moves very slowly. -Peff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
