Hi, On Mon, 9 Jun 2008, Jeff King wrote: > On Mon, Jun 09, 2008 at 07:46:22AM +0200, Johan Herland wrote: > > And I was hoping the right way to do it was to simply build the > interactive "e" command on top of Johannes' git-apply work. But I don't > think that quite makes sense. His work is about fixing up the hunk > header as we apply the patch, but a working "e" command in the hunk > selection should probably not actually apply, but simply split into two > hunks for the loop. Well, maybe I am silly, but I thought that the idea with add -i (e) was to split off the first part, ask the user if that should be applied, and then go on with the rest. But like I said, Junio convinced me that it makes not much sense to split somewhere else than common lines, and you have that already with the "s" command in add -i. In any case, I am happy with "add -e", even more so than I though I would be, and therefore I do not need add -i (e). Thus, I will just shut up and let you guys work it out. Ciao, Dscho -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
