On Monday 09 June 2008, Johannes Schindelin wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 9 Jun 2008, Thomas Rast wrote: > > Compared to the competing bikeshed > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/83894 > > If you really think this is a bikeshed, I better spend my time elsewhere. Is there a good reason against having *both*? AFAICS, there's nothing stopping us from having both a "-e"-option to git-add, and an "e"-command inside git-add--interactive. ...just like we have "-p" and "p" today... ("git-add -e" would open the entire diff in an editor, as would "e" from the *main* menu of git-add--interactive. However, "e" from the *single hunk* menu would of course open only that single hunk within the editor. We could even have an "E" command to open all remaining/undecided hunks in an editor.) Have fun! :) ...Johan -- Johan Herland, <johan@xxxxxxxxxxx> www.herland.net -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
