On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 12:36 AM, Lea Wiemann <lewiemann@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Are you suggesting that the squashed patches get merged, or that the > squashed patches get reviewed but the finer-granulated patches get merged? The latter is what I suggested :). I reckon you'll want ot keep the finger-granulated history for future reference / bisecting, but when reviewing that seems overkill. > In the former case, I'd probably prefer to work with larger patches in the > first place (and not just squash them on the review branch), since they are > easier to handle -- e.g. I sometimes need to go back and change things in > earlier commits, and in those cases larger commits are easier. If you don't think you're omitting information you will want later on (meaning the more specific commit history), by all means, go with the bigger patches. I find it nicer to create small commits, with the plus that it cuts down the size of the commit msg too ;). -- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
